Southampton ReproducibiliTea is a journal club for anyone interested in robust research practice, reproducibility, replication, open science, and transparency.
Usually, in each session we discuss a paper related to a theme, or invite a speaker to do a seminar. You can also see a list of our previous sessions and papers at the bottom of this page.
Our autumn 2023 sessions will be announced shortly.
To be invited to our upcoming sessions, or if you have any questions, please contact one of the organisers:
Follow Southampton ReproducabiliTea on twitter @ReproTeaSoton
Please note: the Southampton UKRN team is not a Library initiative, it has members drawn from all areas of the University and the Research Data team in the Library supports its endeavours (and not just because we like tea and cake!).
ReproducabiliTea is an international ECR-led journal club initiative that helps young researchers create local Open Science groups that discuss issues, papers and ideas to do with improving science. For more information see the ReproducabiliTea Wiki pages and https://reproducibilitea.org for more information about ReproducibiliTea Journal Clubs.. ReproducibiliTea is part of the UK Reproducibility Network. You can follow them on Twitter for updates @ReproducibiliT or @ukrepro
The sessions are open to anybody interested in robust research practice, reproducibility, replication, open science, and transparency. In each session, we will discuss a paper relating to one of these themes.
We will also have guest speakers running seminars about reproducibility and open science practice.
You can join our Microsoft Teams group by emailing one of the team members whose contact details are above. This is the best way to be part of the Southampton ReproducibiliTea community (or communiTea, if you please!) and stay up to date with when our sessions are running.
These courses have been discussed in the Southampton ReproducabiliTEA sessions:
ReproducabiliTea has been running at Southampton since autumn 2019.
| 16/09/2019 | A Manifesto for reproducible science Reading: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-016-0021 |
|||
| 01/10/2019 | False Positive Psychology Reading: https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632 |
|||
| 01/11/2019 | Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices with Incentives for Truth Telling Reading: https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611430953 |
|||
| 11/11/2019 | Estimating the Reproducibility of Psychological Science Reading: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716 |
|||
| 12/12/2019 | Is the Replicability Crisis Overblown? Three Arguments Examined Reading: https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612463401 |
|||
| 13/10/2020 | The strengths and costs of being a reproducible researcher Reading: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VcgO2v3JjCU https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2018.11.030 |
|||
| 28/10/2020 | Does your ten-year-old code still run? Reading: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-02462-7 |
|||
| 12/11/2020 | Reproducibility practices in industry research & development and collaborative projects | |||
| 24/11/2020 | A constructivist perspective on replication in qualitative research Reading: https://osf.io/6efvp/ |
|||
| 09/12/2020 | Structuring your statistical code | |||
| 15/12/2020 | 12 things I wish I knew before Christmas (about reproducibility) | |||
| 02/02/2021 |
Reproducibility in the natural environment: looking at the reproducibility issues in ecological research |
|||
| 17/02/2021 | An integrative framework for planning and conducting Non-Interventional, Reproducible, and Open Systematic Reviews (NIRO-SR) Reading: Topor, Pickering et al. (2020) https://osf.io/preprints/metaarxiv/8gu5z |
|||
| 04/03/2021 | Seven Steps Toward Transparency and Replicability in Psychological Research Reading: Lindsay (2020) - https://onlineacademiccommunity.uvic.ca/lindsaylab/wp-content/uploads/sites/4861/2020/06/Lindsay-RE-Steps-toward-Transparency-1-April-2020-1.pdf |
|||
| 16/03/2021 | Transparency and reproducibility in artificial intelligence research Reading: Haibe-Kains et al. (2020) - https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/2003/2003.00898.pdf / https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2767-x |
|||
| 31/03/2021 | Biological variation and reproducibility in lab-based animal experiments. Reading: Voelkl and Würbel (2020) - Biological variation and reproducibility (YouTube) and Voelkl et al. (2020) - https://www.nature.com/articles/s41583-020-0313-3 |
|||
|
27/04/2021 |
How scientists fool themselves and how they can stop. A Psychological perspective on reproducibility. Reading: Nuzzo (2015) - https://www.nature.com/news/how-scientists-fool-themselves-and-how-they-can-stop-1.18517 |
|||
|
11/05/2021 |
UKRN joint session: Reproducibility for ECRs. Reading: llen and Mehler (2019) - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6513108/ |
|||
|
26/05/2021 |
Checking the reproducibility of your code: CODECHECK Reading: Nüst and Eglen (2021) - https://f1000research.com/articles/10-253 |
|||
| 01/06/2021 |
A discussion with journal editors. |
|||
|
17/06/2021 |
Turning the tables: A university league-table based on quality not quantity. Reading: Barnett and Moher (2019) - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6611132/ |
|||
|
30/06/2021 |
Enhancing reproducibility for computational methods Reading: Stodden et al. (2016) - https://science.sciencemag.org/content/354/6317/1240.long |
|||
| 07/10/2021 | Computational reproducibility Reading: Epistemic Issues in Computational Reproducibility: Software as the Elephant in the Room |
|||
| 19/10/2021 | Joint Southampton ReproducibiliTea and UKRN meeting Reading: Barriers to reproducibility: misalignment of career incentives and open science best practices |
|||
| 03/11/2021 |
Teaching research transparency Reading: Teaching research transparency in psychological science |
|||
| 16/11/2021 | Reproducibility and transparency in writing research | |||
| 02/12/2021 | Open science in archaeology Reading: Open science in archaeology |
|||
| 01/02/2022 | Introduction to reproducible methods in research software Reading Derek Feichtinger (2018) Reproducible Research and Software Development Methods for Management tasks |
|||
| 16/02/2022 | A Philosophical assessment of the reproducibility crisis Reading: Hudson, R. Should We Strive to Make Science Bias-Free? A Philosophical Assessment of the Reproducibility Crisis. J Gen Philos Sci 52, 389–405 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-020-09548-w |
|||
| 03/03/2022 | Research reproducibility in Educational Psychology Reading Hunter Gehlbach & Carly D. Robinson (2021) From old school to open science: The implications of new research norms for educational psychology and beyond, Educational Psychologist, 56:2, 79-89, DOI: 10.1080/00461520.2021.1898961 |
|||
| 15/03/2022 | Open science saves lives: lessons from the Covid-19 pandemic Reading Besançon, L., Peiffer-Smadja, N., Segalas, C. et al. Open science saves lives: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Med Res Methodol 21, 117 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01304-y |
|||
| 30/03/2022 | Citation patterns following a strongly contradictory replication result Reading Citation Patterns Following a Strongly Contradictory Replication Result: Four Case Studies From Psychology - Tom E. Hardwicke, Dénes Szűcs, Robert T. Thibault, Sophia Crüwell, Olmo R. van den Akker, Michèle B. Nuijten, John P. A. Ioannidis, 2021 |
|||
| 13/04/2022 | How low replicability influences trust in Psychology Reading Wingen, T., Berkessel, J. B., & Englich, B. (2020). No Replication, No Trust? How Low Replicability Influences Trust in Psychology. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(4), 454–463. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619877412 |
|||
| 06/10/2022 | Introduction to ReproducibiliTea & Kinds of Replicability Kinds of Replicability: Different Terms and Different Functions (Matarese, 2022) |
|||
| 01/11/2022 | Open Science for Qualitative Research Three Steps to Open Science for Qualitative Research in Psychology (Branney et al., 2022) |
|||
| 30/11/2022 | A Holistic Approach to Open Science Promoting Open Science: A Holistic Approach to Changing Behaviour (Robson et al., 2021) |
|||
| 03/12/2022 | Access to Research Software Global Access to Research Software: The Forgotten Pillar of Open Science Implementation (Vermeir et al., 2018) |
|||
| 23/03/2023 | Methodology Review Boards Is my study useless? Why researchers need methodological review boards (Lakens, 2023). |
|||
| 26/04/2023 | Being more 'open science Developing an open science ‘mindset’ (Hagger, 2022) |
|||
| 10/05/2023 | Machine learning and reproducibility Do machine learning platforms provide out-of-the-box reproducibility? (Gundersen, Shamsaliei & Isdahl, 2022) |
|||
| 25/05/2023 | p-hacking An advanced method to streamline p-hacking (Sarstedt & Adler, 2023) |
|||