Skip to Main Content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.

Love Data @ Soton: Southampton ReproducibiliTea

Logo

WELCOME EVENT

MONDAY 20TH FEBRUARY 2023 I 12:00 - 14:00 I 32/2093

Lunch {probably pizza} will be provided

Southampton ReproducibiliTea is a journal club for anyone interested in robust research practice, reproducibility, replication, open science, and transparency.

Join our welcome session to get to know each other and have an informal chat about all things open science!
Register at: https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/welcome-to-reproducibilitea-tickets-525509251317

We run sessions for anybody interested in robust research practice, reproducibility, replication, open science, and transparency.

Usually, in each session we discuss a paper related to a theme, or invite a speaker to do a seminar. In this session, we won't be discussing a specific paper, but just having a chat about things related to open science. However, if you want to read more about reproducibility before coming, try one of these papers:

If you have any questions, please contact one of the organisers:

 

  Follow Southampton ReproducabiliTea on twitter @ReproTeaSoton

Please note: the Southampton UKRN team is not a Library initiative, it has members drawn from all areas of the University and the Research Data team in the Library supports its endeavours (and not just because we like tea and cake!).

What is ReproducibiliTea?

ReproducabiliTea is an international ECR-led journal club initiative that helps young researchers create local Open Science groups that discuss issues, papers and ideas to do with improving science. For more information see the ReproducabiliTea Wiki pages and https://reproducibilitea.org for more information about ReproducibiliTea Journal Clubs.. ReproducibiliTea is part of the UK Reproducibility Network. You can follow them on Twitter for updates @ReproducibiliT or @ukrepro

The sessions are open to anybody interested in robust research practice, reproducibility, replication, open science, and transparency. In each session, we will discuss a paper relating to one of these themes.

We will also have guest speakers running seminars about reproducibility and open science practice.

You can join our Microsoft Teams group by emailing one of the team members whose contact details are above. This is the best way to be part of the Southampton ReproducibiliTea community (or communiTea, if you please!) and stay up to date with when our sessions are running.

Useful courses for better scientific practice

These courses have been discussed in the Southampton ReproducabiliTEA sessions:

Previous ReproducabiliTea sessions

ReproducabiliTea has been running at Southampton since autumn 2019. Below is the list of previous seminar topics.

16/09/2019 A Manifesto for reproducible science
Reading: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-016-0021
01/10/2019 False Positive Psychology
Reading: https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632
01/11/2019 Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices with Incentives for Truth Telling
Reading: https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611430953
11/11/2019 Estimating the Reproducibility of Psychological Science
Reading: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716
12/12/2019 Is the Replicability Crisis Overblown? Three Arguments Examined
Reading: https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612463401
13/10/2020 The strengths and costs of being a reproducible researcher
Reading: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VcgO2v3JjCU
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2018.11.030
28/10/2020 Does your ten-year-old code still run?
Reading: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-02462-7
12/11/2020 Reproducibility practices in industry research & development and collaborative projects
24/11/2020 A constructivist perspective on replication in qualitative research
Reading: https://osf.io/6efvp/
09/12/2020 Structuring your statistical code
15/12/2020 12 things I wish I knew before Christmas (about reproducibility)
02/02/2021

Reproducibility in the natural environment: looking at the reproducibility issues in ecological research
Reading: O’Grady (2020) - https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abg0894

17/02/2021 An integrative framework for planning and conducting Non-Interventional, Reproducible, and Open Systematic Reviews (NIRO-SR)
Reading: Topor, Pickering et al. (2020) https://osf.io/preprints/metaarxiv/8gu5z
04/03/2021 Seven Steps Toward Transparency and Replicability in Psychological Research
Reading: Lindsay (2020) - https://onlineacademiccommunity.uvic.ca/lindsaylab/wp-content/uploads/sites/4861/2020/06/Lindsay-RE-Steps-toward-Transparency-1-April-2020-1.pdf
16/03/2021 Transparency and reproducibility in artificial intelligence research
Reading: Haibe-Kains et al. (2020) -  https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/2003/2003.00898.pdf / https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2767-x
31/03/2021 Biological variation and reproducibility in lab-based animal experiments.
Reading: Voelkl and Würbel (2020) - Biological variation and reproducibility (YouTube) and Voelkl et al. (2020) - https://www.nature.com/articles/s41583-020-0313-3

27/04/2021

How scientists fool themselves and how they can stop. A Psychological perspective on reproducibility.

Reading: Nuzzo (2015) - https://www.nature.com/news/how-scientists-fool-themselves-and-how-they-can-stop-1.18517

11/05/2021

UKRN joint session: Reproducibility for ECRs.

Reading: llen and Mehler (2019) - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6513108/

26/05/2021

Checking the reproducibility of your code: CODECHECK

Reading: Nüst and Eglen (2021) -  https://f1000research.com/articles/10-253

01/06/2021

A discussion with journal editors.

17/06/2021

Turning the tables: A university league-table based on quality not quantity.

Reading: Barnett and Moher (2019) - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6611132/

30/06/2021

Enhancing reproducibility for computational methods

Reading: Stodden et al. (2016) - https://science.sciencemag.org/content/354/6317/1240.long

07/10/2021 Computational reproducibility
Reading: Epistemic Issues in Computational Reproducibility: Software as the Elephant in the Room
19/10/2021 Joint Southampton ReproducibiliTea and UKRN meeting
Reading: Barriers to reproducibility: misalignment of career incentives and open science best practices
03/11/2021

Teaching research transparency

Reading: Teaching research transparency in psychological science

16/11/2021 Reproducibility and transparency in writing research
02/12/2021 Open science in archaeology
Reading: Open science in archaeology
01/02/2022 Introduction to reproducible methods in research software
Reading Derek Feichtinger (2018) Reproducible Research and Software Development Methods for Management tasks
   
16/02/2022 A Philosophical assessment of the reproducibility crisis
Reading: Hudson, R. Should We Strive to Make Science Bias-Free? A Philosophical Assessment of the Reproducibility Crisis. J Gen Philos Sci 52, 389–405 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-020-09548-w
   
03/03/2022 Research reproducibility in Educational Psychology
Reading Hunter Gehlbach & Carly D. Robinson (2021) From old school to open science: The implications of new research norms for educational psychology and beyond, Educational Psychologist, 56:2, 79-89, DOI: 10.1080/00461520.2021.1898961
   
15/03/2022 Open science saves lives: lessons from the Covid-19 pandemic
Reading Besançon, L., Peiffer-Smadja, N., Segalas, C. et al. Open science saves lives: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Med Res Methodol 21, 117 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01304-y
   
30/03/2022 Citation patterns following a strongly contradictory replication result
Reading Citation Patterns Following a Strongly Contradictory Replication Result: Four Case Studies From Psychology - Tom E. Hardwicke, Dénes Szűcs, Robert T. Thibault, Sophia Crüwell, Olmo R. van den Akker, Michèle B. Nuijten, John P. A. Ioannidis, 2021
   
13/04/2022 How low replicability influences trust in Psychology
Reading Wingen, T., Berkessel, J. B., & Englich, B. (2020). No Replication, No Trust? How Low Replicability Influences Trust in Psychology. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(4), 454–463. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619877412
   
06/10/2022 Introduction to ReproducibiliTea & Kinds of Replicability
Kinds of Replicability: Different Terms and Different Functions (Matarese, 2022)
 
01/11/2022 Open Science for Qualitative Research
Three Steps to Open Science for Qualitative Research in Psychology (Branney et al., 2022)
 
30/11/2022 A Holistic Approach to Open Science
Promoting Open Science: A Holistic Approach to Changing Behaviour (Robson et al., 2021)
 
03/12/2022 Access to Research Software
Global Access to Research Software: The Forgotten Pillar of Open Science Implementation (Vermeir et al., 2018)